Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 2022 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2029029

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunosuppressive therapies may have a blunted response to certain vaccines, including the messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. However, few studies have evaluated the cell-mediated immune response (CMIR), which is critical to host defense after COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response and CMIR after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IBD. METHODS: This prospective study (HERCULES [HumoRal and CellULar initial and Sustained immunogenicity in patients with IBD] study) evaluated humoral immune response and CMIR after completion of 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in 158 IBD patients and 20 healthy control (HC) subjects. The primary outcome was the CMIR to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD. The secondary outcomes were a comparison of (1) the CMIR in patients with IBD and HC subjects, (2) CMIR and humoral immune response in all participants, and (3) correlation between CMIR and humoral immune response. RESULTS: The majority (89%) of patients with IBD developed a CMIR, which was not different vs HC subjects (94%) (P = .6667). There was no significant difference (P = .5488) in CMIR between immunocompetent (median 255 [interquartile range, 146-958] spike T cells per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and immunosuppressed patients (median 377 [interquartile range, 123-1440]). There was no correlation between humoral and cell-mediated immunity after vaccination (P = .5215). In univariable analysis, anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy was associated with a higher CMIRs (P = .02) and confirmed in a multivariable model (P = .02). No other variables were associated with CMIR. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with IBD achieved CMIR to a COVID-19 vaccine. Future studies are needed evaluating sustained CMIR and clinical outcomes.


Antibody and T cell responses to coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease do not correlate. Most patients with inflammatory bowel disease mount a T cell response despite being on biologic therapies, those on anti-tumor necrosis factor may have a higher T cell response. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy has been associated with a lower antibody response to coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines, but the T cell response is augmented.

2.
Acad Radiol ; 29(10): 1480-1485, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1649780

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Reported incidence of vaccine-induced adenopathy varies widely, with higher estimates in early reports and small series. Objective was to evaluate a large sample of vaccinated patients undergoing screening mammography, to determine callback rates associated with vaccine-induced adenopathy and their outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-institution retrospective review of patients who received at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine prior to presentation for screening mammography from January 15 through May 31, 2021. Patient-related vaccination information (dose, brand, arm, date) was obtained by mammography technologists and available for interpreting radiologists. Patients recalled for axillary adenopathy were included; other causes for recall were excluded. Follow-up imaging and outcomes were tracked. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher exact test, multivariable logistic regression modeling, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were utilized. All tests were two-sided; p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Total of 2304 vaccinated patients underwent screening mammography; 24 (1.0%) recalled for ipsilateral adenopathy. There was no significant difference in presence of adenopathy associated with patient age, dose, or brand of vaccine. Presence of adenopathy significantly decreased as days from vaccination increased (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve suggested 28.5 days as the best cutoff point to distinguish presence or absence of adenopathy on mammogram. Of 24 callbacks, 13 (54.2%) had benign results, 2 (8.3%) are still undergoing surveillance, and 9 (37.5%) are overdue for subsequent follow-ups. No cases resulted in biopsy or malignancy. CONCLUSION: Low recall rates related to vaccine-induced adenopathy are achievable and can limit unnecessary workups, improve access, and promote flexible timing of vaccinations and screening exams.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19 Vaccines , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Lymphadenopathy/chemically induced , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/methods , Mass Screening/methods
3.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 6(2): 120-125, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1561885

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the magnitude of humoral response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in patients with cancer receiving active therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 18 years or older in whom SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody (anti-S Ab) levels were measured after 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were included. Patients with prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection or receiving other immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. RESULTS: Among 201 patients who met the criteria, 61 were immunocompetent, 91 had a hematologic malignancy, and 49 had a solid malignancy while receiving treatments associated with cytopenia, including chemotherapy or cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors. A significantly greater proportion of immunocompetent patients (96.7% [59 of 61]) had anti-S Ab titers of 500 U/mL or greater compared to patients with hematologic (7.7% [7 of 91) and solid (55.1% [27 of 49]) malignancy (P<.001). Despite 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, 52.7% of patients with hematologic malignancy (48 of 91) and 8.2% of those with solid malignancy (4 of 49) receiving cytopenic therapy had no seroconversion (spike antibody titers <0.8 U/mL). Two patients subsequently had development of breakthrough COVID-19 infection after full vaccination. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients with hematologic and solid malignancies receiving chemotherapies and CDK4/6i had poor humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Our study adds to a growing body of literature suggesting that immunosuppressed patients have a suboptimal humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination. Our study also underscores the importance of assessing antibody response after COVID-19 vaccines in these vulnerable patients.

4.
Ann Nucl Med ; 35(11): 1264-1269, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1378991

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are known to provide an immune response seen on FDG PET studies. However, the time course of this metabolic response is unknown. We here present a temporal metabolic response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in oncology patients undergoing standard of care FDG PET. METHODS: 262 oncology patients undergoing standard of care FDG PET were included in the analysis. 231 patients had at least one dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine while 31 patients had not been vaccinated. The SUVmax of the lymph nodes ipsilateral to the vaccination was compared to the contralateral to obtain an absolute change in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax). RESULTS: ΔSUVmax was more significant at shorter times between FDG PET imaging and COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, with a median ΔSUVmax of 2.6 (0-7 days), 0.8 (8-14 days), and 0.3 (> 14 days), respectively. CONCLUSION: Consideration should be given to performing FDG PET at least 2 weeks after the COVID-19 vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/metabolism , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axilla , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/metabolism , Humans , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/immunology , Lymph Nodes/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Pectoralis Muscles , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Time Factors , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage
6.
Radiol Case Rep ; 16(8): 2226-2230, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1267898

ABSTRACT

A 55-year-old asymptomatic woman with newly diagnosed, locally advanced breast cancer undergoing routine staging with 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was found to have multiple hypermetabolic pulmonary nodules on imaging that were concerning for metastatic disease. However, further workup with dedicated chest computed tomography imaging demonstrated multiple bilateral, peripheral nodular lesions with peripheral ground-glass opacity, predominantly in the lower lung zone, that were suspicious for coronavirus disease 2019. The patient ultimately was diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 based on detection of viral ribonucleic acid via polymerase chain reaction. Follow-up chest computed tomography scan obtained after 27 days showed complete resolution of the lung lesions. In the setting of a global pandemic, a high index of suspicion for coronavirus disease 2019 in cancer patients is warranted, not only to enable early identification and treatment of a potentially aggressive infection but also to prevent misdiagnosis of metastatic disease.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL